
Progressivism is an extremely dangerous pathology aimed at achieving totalitarianism. It relies on groupthink and uses conformity, self-censorship, propaganda, and gaslighting to prevent opposition. The high-profile U.N. and WEF global agendas draw attention, while progressive city politics are largely ignored. This article will plumb the depths of how municipal strategies are shaped by the influential international and nonprofit organizations that destroy civil and property rights making cities nearly uninhabitable.
Conference of Mayors
The Mayors United States Conference of 91st Winter Meeting met last week, promoting sustainability, equity, and net-zero carbon emissions. It is the ultimate groupthink exercise creating a united voice on progressive policies and goals. But, tragically, the Conference ignored the ‘elephant in the room’ of illegal migration overwhelming cities. However, the Conference had a plenary session addressing domestic violent extremism. So who are the real extremists?

Francis Suarez, Miami’s Mayor, serves as President of the Conference. In May 2022, Suarez participated in WEF’s annual meeting in Davos. He’s a globalist at heart.

Unprecedented Federal Spending
Thanks to Biden spendthrift bills, the cities have blank checks for hundreds of billions to use towards those initiatives. Due to the windfall, they will behave like trust-fund babies funding progressive projects that will result in malinvestment, fraud, waste, and abuse – count on it. Political patronage will be rewarded. In addition, it will be a platform for promoting cultural in-groups.

Treasury’s Equity Advisory Committee
Last fall, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced an Advisory Committee on Racial Equity (AKA TACRE) to promote equity justice policies. The Committee’s scope is to “identify, monitor, and review aspects of the domestic economy that have directly and indirectly resulted in unfavorable conditions…for persons of color.” This will have a far-reaching impact on how municipalities deploy Federal grants. The goal is to create a permanent mechanism advancing discrimination to achieve collectivism.
PolicyLink’s CEO Michael McAfee anchors TACRE. PolicyLink, a fanatical nonprofit organization, promotes wealth redistribution and reparations. Partnering with USC Equity Research Institute created the National Equity Atlas model for municipalities to track, measure, and redistribute resources. Mr. McAfee describes the model as “a story platform…and tell narratives.” The concept is an affirmative action contrivance.

At the TACRE launch, panel member Ron Nirenberg, Mayor of San Antonio, boasted (45 sec. clip) the City’s prototype Equity Atlas as the best practice in advancing equity justice. It assigns equity scores by census tracts and then aggregates by districts. Census tracts can earn a favorable score based on the higher percentage of people of color, Spanish as a first language, high illiteracy, and below-median household income. Census tracts with high scores prioritize resource allocations—violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment and Article 1 of the Texas Constitution.

ICLEI – Local Government for Sustainability
ICLEI (pronounced ick-ly) is a U.N.-sanctioned non-government organization (aka NGO) that helped write Agenda 21. It removed International from its name to mask foreign influence over American local governments. ICLEI provides training and the tools for cities and counties to carry out the local goals of U.N. Agenda 21. Over 600 U.S. municipalities are network members using tax dollars to support ICKEI. Check your city’s website if you are skeptical.
ICLEI promotes high-density urban development. ICLEI member cities use their general funds and infrastructure bonds to fund intercity and downtown projects depriving lower-density residential areas of infrastructure improvements and maintenance. ICLEI’s tactics, circumventing taxpayer approval, include redevelopment financing zones, eminent domain, conservation easements, habitat conservation, and strict zoning regulations. Ordinances eroding personal property rights.
ICLEI announced a six-year plan for sustainable urban development for the next six years, locally and globally. ICLEI designs regulations and policies, which cities implement without the public’s consent.

United Nations Agenda 2030
Agenda 2030 is an international action program for achieving sustainable development (17 goals) during the 21st century. Governments would control all land use for the “community’s good” while eliminating private property owners’ rights. The goal is to restrict human habitation to government-controlled centralized zones. However, “collectivism” is not entitled to individual rights protected under the U.S. Constitution.

The U.N.’s Making Cities Resilient 2030 (MCR2030) initiative is based on Sustainable Goal 11. There are over 1,485 cities that participate in the program. MCR2030 has stated its goal as follows:
“MCR2030 aims to ensure cities become inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable by 2030, contributing directly to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 11 (SDG11) Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable, and other global frameworks including the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, the Paris Agreement, and the New Urban Agenda.”
Bloomberg’s C40 Initiative
Michael Bloomberg Philanthropies funds the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group initiative, a network of 941 world cities. Like most billionaires, Bloomberg uses his nonprofit as a form of tribute to cultural in-groups to avoid criticism of his pursuit of wealth.

C40 funds campaigns for urgent climate change action rooted in social and justice equity with a path to a zero-carbon future. Radical Mayor of London Sadiq Khan chairs C40.
GARE – Alliance on Race and Equity
The Local and Regional Government Alliance on Race and Equity (GARE) is a pseudo-national organization that provides resources and workshops on racial equity. GARE has never legally organized, requiring the 350+ municipal governments to remit millions in membership dues (tribute) to the radical Race Forward. The lack of GARE financial disclosures raises the issue of how the funds were used. GARE is a puppet of Race Forward used to indoctrinate racial prejudice and promote equity justice within municipal governments.

Inverted Language
“Equity justice” is the Neo-Marxist mantra, a euphemism for resource redistribution and reparations. A term not found in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Personal and economic freedom can lead to inequitable outcomes based on an individual’s abilities, intellect, deferred gratification, and motivation. Yet, it creates a more dynamic and affluent society. Equity redistribution is utopian socialism destroying personal responsibility and property rights leading to impoverished living standards.
Social media accounts are – YouTube, Twitter, and Linkedin.
It’s very simple: Non governmental organizations are governmental organizations.
Hard to believe, but words can lie…..
They use inverted language. “There is no swifter route to the corruption of thought than through the corruption of language.” ~ George Orwell
I wouldn’t worry too much about this, just more government programs doomed to failure. It will only accelerate the collapse. The collapse cannot be stopped so the sooner it happend the better off we will be, able to start rebuilding.
The combined west has run its course as having any relevance or significance. We will collapse into a third world society. Where scarcity and violence dominates. Having the capacity for nuclear we’ll continue to be a threat to sovereignty and peace.
Nope. It has not. The west has been temporarily (I sincerely hope) hijacked by socialist pukes. The world, without the west, would be a terrible place. If we can be rid of the progressive/marxist usurpers, we will be back bigger and better than ever and be extremely relevant.
It seems to me that “people of colour” you love so much are going to get rid of you. Payback is a bitch, and the bill is long.
Eric, we can’t vote our way out if this. The only reset is via the collapse of the federal structure, sending rights and powers back to the states.
Or a civil war.
Really no other outcome.
No argument from me re; what you say.
The world without the west would be a terrible place because:
– the world won’t be lectured on human rights by those who consistently violate it (e.g. Gitmo)?
– poor but resource rich countries will no longer be exploited?
– countries won’t get invaded in the name of “freedom and democracy”?
– there won’t be a group of people who consider themselves superior to the rest of the world?
Oh my, what a terrible place it would be indeed. I very much look forward to it.
Progressivism is an extremely dangerous pathology aimed at achieving totalitarianism.
Well, I’m at least relieved to see that it’s not *Larry* issuing this obnoxious screed.
Understanding meaning of all those -ism words require decent education. Since such thing is non existent in the good old USA, people use words at random. Nowdays billionaires are not capitalists but socialists.
The thing is, they’re both. Look into Fabian Socialism.
The thing is, you are just another sample of what “dictionary” says.
PS: JMF, no, Larry just allows this ****** to write such things on his blog.
That’s called facism.
Wow. Finally it is all in the open. I recall a video where Crazy Lord Monkton was speaking in Australia to a group of people about Tony Abbott and protecting him at all costs. Some opt out clause at some climate conference. Apparently Canada had used it but don’t worry an election was coming to Canada and a new leader would be elected. Crazy or prophetic, here we are today. For the life of me I cannot find this video anywhere today. Most of us who just went to work and toiled away really never thought in a million years that our own governments despised us to this extent. Thanks Bob
I used to be proud to be a Progressive–a follower of Will Rogers, as expressed in “Bacon, Beans, and Limousines.” I still think that Rogers had it right but where all this other stuff came from I don’t know and I can’t buy into it. I still don’t meet a man I don’t like–but that feeling is subject to change. As to immigrants, I don’t understand why our State Department doesn’t spend less time overthrowing their governments and more time helping them making their countries livable while they are still there–or maybe I do understand.
Great piece, Bob. Yep. Typical “progressive” scams that are destroying this country.
They should be focussed on programs to encourage the nuclear family, high quality STEM education, bringing good manufacturing/jobs back to blighted communities, eliminating illegal immigrants, drugs and other forms of human trafficking. The focus on race as a determiner of handout allocation is abominable and will further divide the country; a pathetic form of subtle racism that keeps blacks on the plantation. Idiots.
But the programs we recommend would actually work and the people would then be weaned away from government handouts and become independent and successful. Progressives cannot allow that. Then they themselves would have to get real jobs and earn whatever they have – and lose their slaves.
Sound like you want to copy Russia.
The “progressive” (not) “woke” politics that seemingly came out of nowhere (HINT: CIA) in the last few years have slowly become known to average folks who could not care less about “equity” and “trans rights” malarkey. Maybe it’s taken awhile for normal people to get hip to this but there are more of us every day. The pendulum is slowly swinging the other way. Parents are questioning what their children are being taught and the efforts of government to censor and mislead us are being exposed.
The real source of this is the very top of the food chain, which is a cult whose members are terrified of their own mortality. These are the politically powerful and the mega rich techno worshipping transhumanist weirdos who want to be immortal via merging with machines, even going so far into fantasyland as to think they can “upload” their consciousness to a computer (as if they even understand what is consciousness!). The whole push to accept “trans” people is designed to pave the way for this, in addition to indoctrinating the young into the idea that the most basic biological reality – male and female – doesn’t really exist, so they can be easily manipulated to believe just about anything (SEE: UFOs/aliens).
1.) Erase fundamental biological identity
2.) Render language meaningless
3.) Rewrite or erase history
4.) Make the idea of borders/sovereign countries into something “racist”
5.) Promote the idea of corporate-government “partnerships”
6.) Pump everyone full of Rx drugs
I’m not worried about these nutcases who, precisely because their hatred of humanity and self loathing means they aren’t going to be reproducing. In 10-20 years we’re going to have an epidemic of death and illness from all of this ill-advised medical “transitioning” whether it be via hormones or chip implantation or mass mRNA injections. Meanwhile, all of the “normals” are going to continue reproducing.
All bullshit eventually collapses under its own weight.
I agree. Just the bizarreness of someone thinking that anyone’s sexual habits define their gender, is completely beyond me! Despite agreeing, it is obvious that it is the values that define a society and even a civilization! But how many people in America are cutting their stick to open a split between their legs? And vice versa? And how many lost their jobs in the 2008 crash? How many cities were literally wiped out?
And the same with emigration populism and I don’t want to be misunderstood because we in Europe have the same problem. And when we only make wars, what are we waiting to reap? Peaches? But it was also emigration that made America! If today there is a crime problem among the emigrant population, it cannot be said that the problem is emigration, which ends up affecting many worthy people who have been working in the US for decades, contributing to the common well-being of the country!
Even this conflict in Ukraine has nothing to do with emigrants or sexual habits. Despite Ukraine also being a pre-war sex tourist destination due to its poverty! But the US is at war with Russia and China in Ukraine mainly to destroy their alliance that aims to destroy the dollar as the world’s great monetary reference. Without the US would literally collapse economically! All of America’s biggest problems today are economic. Only the hole in private health prevents any economic conversion so often promised! And I think it was America’s big problems that Americans should be focusing on. Especially how they let the financial markets seize political power in America? For many years now, the largest global investment funds have guided America’s destiny. And that subtract billions from the American economy every year. And also because of this they are not connected to the daily problems of the Americans. And then at home, when there is no bread, everyone scolds and no one is right!
IMO,
Woke/Progressive “thinking” is straight up Marxism and it came from Alinsky types via China and Russia and European garbage, not the CIA. It started big time in the 1960s. Now the idiot children of the ’60s children are running the show and have replicated their sorry asses in the education system. It was a deliberate plot to weaken (or destroy) the USA from within since the commies were too weak to do it by direct confrontation.
What is this pathological need to blame everything on the “CIA” while ignoring the actions of the Soviets and the communist Chinese? I suspect it is communists still trying to hide among us and deflect blame from where it belongs.
re: “I suspect it is communists still trying to hide among us”
Not even the Chinese communists are actual communists, and the Russians already dispensed with this nonsense.
The agenda is clearly from the top of the western ruling class. If you don’t think the CIA aka “the intelligence community” is in charge of that, I don’t know what to say.
CIA is communist.
You’ve never read Marx have you? You’re just repeating staff you heard.
It’s precisely because Marx is ignored that the US citizenry have allowed this shit show to come into existence.
*stuff
Mr. Johnson; this is the agenda in canada. it sounds nice but behind it is the 15 minute city agenda behind it is quite sinister. the movie logans run from 1976 which is still on bitchute (https://seed150.bitchute.com/5W8Qpgv76n77/pEeLFTjQOC4t.mp4)showed this dystopian future which is know occurring where everything you wanted was given to you but at a very high price.
https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20201214-how-15-minute-cities-will-change-the-way-we-socialise
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/15minute-city-falls-short/
https://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/cities-villes/index-eng.html
the SMART devices are not what they are cracked up to be as per below. i found this
5G – SMART = Secret Militarized Armaments in Residential Technology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6Cttcbsk0I
the only bastion of conservatism left in canada is alberta. if it falls to the libtards this may in their next election it will be taken over. the 15 minute video by the ex nhl hockey play theo fleury is the 2nd one on the playlist and he sums it up quite well.
it any of you are still into sports with conservative commentators then this outkick.com website and yt channel is for you.
https://www.outkick.com/vox-media-layoff-7-percent-workforce-sb-nation-nhl-team-sites-hockey-woke-broke/
https://www.youtube.com/@OutKick/videos
regards,
ralph
I don’t understand how the term progressive can have such a negative connotation in the US! It’s actually a paradox. Progress in itself is never a negative thing. With left or right governments as they used to say. Contrary to what happened in America and much of the western world from the 1980s onwards – a real regression in the standard of living – when people were always moving backwards in all matters related to their life! From the loss of rights, to the freezing of wages and the loss of the very stable job that neoliberalism destroyed! Where we are all disposable collaborators! And it’s not worth wasting time with much smaller agendas with which, in my opinion, Americans waste a lot of time and even divide themselves a lot if not on the big issues for everyone’s lives like school, health, housing, employment and pension funds we have an answer or at least we manage to understand each other.
And at the end of the day in the war in Ukraine are many progressives at the same barricade that many conservatives are not? At least everyone who defends a sovereign country with regulated financial markets and jobs with rights unlike Bezos’ Amazon!
Just to see if I understand correctly with an example known to everyone, is Jeremy Corbyn a progressive or a socialist? Or both? Or a dangerous and subversive leftist? Who ended up looking like a bit of an idiot after waiting so long. And the economist Michael Hudson? In Europe, too, there are proven anti-drug programs for several decades! The images I’ve seen of Philadelphia, for example, for decades and I don’t even know if they’re always the same, are a disgrace anywhere in the world! In some Brazilian big cities there are also identicals zones. Neighborhoods or avenues of drug trafficking and consumption in plain sight. Which is first and foremost a problem for the municipal – city hall – authorities, which is not equivalent to saying that they can only be solved with repression. But that should be resolved for the common good. Perhaps the US spends too much money on wars abroad and then there is no money for problems at home. Not to mention basic infrastructure like the subway in NY! Supposed a tourism hight spot of Big Aple.
In USA English words have different meaning than in the rest of the World. Progress is a backward thing, war is peace, invading is defensive, freedom is slavery, equlity is segragation, capital is socialist and left wing, and football is not actuall football.
“CIA is communist.”
Jesus wept. The problem I have is that, this being an American site, i can’t tell for the life of me if this is a sincere comment or a dig at the blog’s readership 😅
😅 Spot on!
As we say in Spain: progresista es a progreso lo que carterista es a cartera.
In Spain there are also a lot of stupid simple people, that think that any saying they like has an actual meaning.
That what you said expresses more about you, than about being progressive.
(You also expect people here to translate what you said? Again, this says a lot about you).
Progressivism is the old creepy communism with some modernization to make it more palatable. Apart from the old communist strategy of promoting hate and violence between workers and capitalists, now they do the same for blacks against whites, women against men, homo against hetero, ilegal aliens against citizens, luddites against people using technology (this includes the climate change movement, antiGMO movement, antinuclear movement, depopulation movement…), etc.
Their methods are the same: censorship, double-speak, massive propaganda, violence, and above all making an enemy of some sector of the society, against which they present themselves as the only and final solution.
Yes. Exactly. Alinsky acolytes.
Few here will admit that b/c this blog seems to be becoming a hangout for such Marxist types. They mistakenly believe that patriotic criticism of the USA = Marxist hatred of it. The idiots actually think we can be tricked into being allies.
This post received few comments b/c the Marxists don’t like it, yet do not want to reveal themselves for what they are by commenting.
Hi Eric,
Now I’m even more confused. But where are Marxists and Communists in power in the US? Today or sometime? And if I may be allowed merely as an academic, this association of Marx with communism is profoundly wrong. Marx was appropriated by the Leninist or communist interpretation as they call him in Russia. A revolution that also only lasted 10 years. Stalin is was a nationalist, pure and hard. Marx limited himself to criticizing Industry during the Industrial Revolution when it was basically owned by Messrs. Feudal. All of Marx’s work is perfectly dated on the labor exploitation of the time and all appropriations and extrapolations are the responsibility of those who make them! All matters that have nothing to do with our time! Where even in Europe there are no Marxist or communist parties, let alone in power.
When I look today at the two parties in the US, I don’t see more than two lobby hostels. A legal activity, by the way, in the US. Many of the lobbies in the two parties, as per name, corruption works. He never distributes money just to one side at the risk of being out of power. Today politics and power centers all revolve around the economy or financial power to be clear and I honestly don’t see any difference between Democrats and Republicans. And Europe in general. Today, the West has been taken over by neoliberalism, which is basically an apology for deregulation. Not just financially but in general. That’s why the financial markets crashed in 2008, or if you prefer, the big banks, the big investment funds and the big fortunes with instruments to make the population pay for the neoliberal casino.
Basically that’s what happened in the world as a result of the crash. The largest transfer from private debt to public debt for the budgets of countries in memory! That once indebted, they no longer have money for other public policies. As for the identity agendas that you discuss a lot in America, I usually prefer not to comment and I think they only serve to divide peoples. And even about US internal politics, I think this is the first time I comment here on Larry’s blog. Who commands the US are the great fortunes that bought the two parties a long time ago! How anyone can see communists in the US in the 21st century is a real mystery to me. What I always saw in the US were great social tensions and I see Americans more concerned with these social tensions than with the real center of power. How power must like it.
“But where are Marxists and Communists in power in the US? ”
Paulo, you are trying to reason with these guys???
Anything that Eric does not like in USA, is communism.
The same for Antonio in Spain.
Looks what a reasoning:
“Progressivism is the old creepy communism with some modernization to make it more palatable”
If I were such a ***** like Antonio, I would say “Capitalism is the old creepy feudalism with some modernization to make it more palatable”.
Do you think you can exchange opinions with such bigots????
All of the activist groups – like Black Lives Matter – are communists. They even say so themselves. These petty tyrants that run local governments make statements that clearly are right out of socialists manifestos. The whole notion that the world is a story of oppressors and oppressed is a communist outlook.
I do agree that the top rungs of power are not communists.They are oligarchs, but they use communist ideology to appease those they are ruling over. They are willing to redistribute hard earned wealth from those who earned it to those who have not and they give much lip service to oppressor/oppressed ideology. They do not want their wealth redistributed and won’t allow that, but the wealth of those further down the ladder? Sure. Communism as the opiate of the masses.
Some here don’t like that reality because they are communists.
It’s not that they use Marxist ‘ideology;’ it’s more like they use his class analysis methods to divide society. They are Trostkyists. Even Dennis Prager admitted on his show that he was a Trot in University. This isn’t a coincidence.
The left has long ago given up on trying to reach the working class. Look at who they appeal to today: investment bankers, tech bros, baristas, and degenerate criminals. What do all these groups have in common? They don’t produce anything.
When was the last time a Western Leftist appealed to a real member of the working class? You know, train engineers, truck drivers, farmers (sounds like MAGA to me)? The 30s? No, today they have nothing but contempt for the people who make their comfortable lives possible. Remember when the actual working class of Canada told Trudeau to piss off with his mandates? The left derided them as fascists and government agents tried to wreck their protest with a swastika flag. HMMMMMMMMMM.
Western ‘Communists’ (Fabian socialists) like Tulano de Fail think they know better than everyone else, it’s why they love to trash religion, traditional values, etc. on here. Chinese commies have a name for them: Baizuo.
Meanwhile the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is allied to the Orthodox Church. HMMMMMMMMM.
Given all the other things we know and suspect about the ruling class: all the whores descending on Davos last week, a nonconsensual multi billion human being clinical trial, Epstein Island, and literally supplying heavy weapons to Ukrainian practitioners of paganism, an outside observer looking in would have to conclude that Global Capital was on the side of Satan.
Vaya, otro iluminado.
So progressivism “relies on groupthink and uses conformity, self-censorship, propaganda, and gaslighting to prevent opposition”. As opposed to conservatism or any other philosophy.
Quite simply, the rules are set for the rich to get very rich and the poor to stay poor. Poor people want to live. If they are thrown out of housing, they find somewhere to live. They move to towns or cities where they won’t starve. Or across borders.
You want Latin Americans to stay home? Stop overthrowing governments, creating death squads etc. to the South of the US.
You want the poor and the homeless to stop living on the streets? Make sure that there is affordable housing.
As far as not teaching our children about racism or people being gay, that’s real simple. Study science, read about real history, not cherry tree chopping. If you live in lies don’t be surprised if you get called on it.
Wow! Progressive mayors huh? Who controls the economy of the world and our destiny? I would think the Davos crowd! The “homeless crisis” is largely due to Private Equity paying cash for homes and rental property, keeping them off the market and/or using algorithms that amount to illegal cartel price fixing, so NOTHING is affordable for mere working folks.
Who sent the decent manufacturing jobs overseas? It wasn’t the mayors, was it? Is our inflation high due to admitted price gouging by corporate elites? Who stole the homes of the middle class after the 2008 economic meltdown? People like Steve Mnuchin of “Gold Man Sacks”, who learned the tricks during the S&L Crisis back in the 1980s. He’s featured in a book titled “Homewreckers”
https://www.amazon.com/Homewreckers-Kingpins-Magnates-Capitalists-Demolished/dp/0062869531/ref=sr_1_3
These are good observations on Davos
https://kenklippenstein.substack.com/p/the-5-creepiest-moments-at-davos
More on Davos:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/wef-davos-new-sodom-gomorrah/5805074
https://www.globalresearch.ca/davos-2023-fragmenting-world/5804639?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles
https://www.globalresearch.ca/dangerous-thought-control-from-world-economic-forum-globalism-transhumanism-inevitable-destiny-humanity/5805006?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles
Remember the Braceros Program? That started in WW2 after we interned the Japanese, many of who were farmers . We interned them because we’d broken the Japanese Diplomatic Codes, and we knew exactly who all the spies were, but had we simply arrested THEM, the Japanese would realize we’d broken the code! It’s a fascinating story and came up in the Congressional Hearing about it and reparations, but was ignored, due to early “wokeness”.
https://www.amazon.com/Magic-Intelligence-Evacuation-Japanese-Residents/dp/0960273611
The Progressives brought us the 8 hour work day, Congress is responsible for the lack of immigration controls and our border problems. Who’s pollution is causing severe drought for the subsistence farmers migrating here from south of the border? USA pollution is a major factor in the Global Climate Crisis. Or is it their own fault?
Wokeness is responsible for silly terms like “pregnant people”, um, they’re called WOMEN! The mayors may be aboard that and similar silliness, but it’s the greedy elites and income inequality, not seen on such a scale since the Depression of the 1930s, that is responsible for most of our problems, because capitalists, the class who hated FDR and the NEW Deal, have been working to undo his reforms, that SAVED capitalism from going to terminal Stage 4 cancer! The repeal of Glass-Steagall was a HUGE mistake!
The mayors have zero power compared to the Davos crowd, none! Pin the tail on the correct donkey, they don’t hold a candle compared to the real villains bringing us dystopia. Do you think “The Matrix” movies are fiction? They aren’t far from being documentaries.
The mayors have lots of power. Just one form of it is controlling the education systems, which is control of the future. The top elites/Davos have less power than the grass roots. The people are many and Davos are few.
Something I have noticed among the socialists commenting here and elsewhere is that the seem to think that the people have no agency. Like they are just mass herds of stupid sheep easily controlled by some small cabal of conspiratorial all powerful evil geniuses. That is interesting. They never explain exactly how the small cabal manages that, They just know it’s true. I suspect it is because the socialists really don’t believe I power to the people and merely wish that they themselves were running the herd.
“Equity justice”? Not a concept that can be found in any kind of Marxism. But hey, please yourselves in your ignorance.
Mere semantic game on your part. I can never tell if people making arguments like you are autistic, obtuse or purely mendacious. I tend toward the latter.
The best trick of the devil is convince people he doesn’t exist. Marists? What Marxists? I don’t see any. These are not the subversives you are looking for.
Equity is absolutely a Marxist concept by another name.
If class conflict is one of thee most central ideals of Marxism, then Marxism has been defeated. The central conflicts as defined by a group labeled as “liberals” and “progressives” is based on identity. Listen to modern feminists and they see history as nothing more than the subjugation of women and their struggle against patriarchy. CRT sees the central historical issue as white skin against black skin regardless of how many African tribes fueled European slavery. Class conflict? Nowhere to be found. Hillary Clinton is much a victim as Rosa Parks.
The way I see it, it seems to me that all this talk about “equity”, “inclusivism”, etc. it is a narrative construct that the elites at the top need to navigate the huge economic crisis resulting from the actual bursting of the derivatives bubble that has been growing exponentially since before 2008.
The wave of poverty and hunger that this will cause, which would naturally trigger a hunting season in those at the top organizing governments and the economy over the last few decades, those at the top believe they could prevent by offering the masses the goods of the middle-class to share with each other.
Thus, all this talk, together with the recruitment and loyalty of minorities of any kind, is aimed at provoking a sense among these minorities that they have the right to be assigned property belonging to others in exchange for their perpetual vote in favor of those in government who intend to perpetuate themselves there through the demonization and criminalization of any real opposition through self-coups or false flag events….
Just today I was reading the last analysis by The Saker on US elites, and by reading this excerpt on 9/11, made me think of the similarity with our current situation….
“By the way, 9/11 played a crucial role here.
It is quite obvious that 9/11 was a Neocon “inside job” and that is served as a pretext to start the GWOT. However, it also had another very important role: it forced each public figure in the USA to chose one of two camps:
-Be obedient and accept the (terminally idiotic) conspiracy theory of the White House or
-Lose your job, position, reputation and means of income.
Most, unsurprisingly, caved in and 9/11 ended “binding up together” the entire US ruling class. That type of bond is the type criminal accomplices have: if one goes down, everybody goes down, hence the omertà around the topic of 9/11 even though it was proven by a preponderance of evidence and even beyond reasonable doubt that 9/11 was, indeed, an inside job. After 9/11, true dissent was completely removed from the US political discourse.
I think the Covid pandemic was our 9/11 event to silence everyone and get everyone to accept a new big war in Europe which will then justify other “emergency measures” such as requisitioning of funds and property. .
All Western elites were co-opted, blackmailed or tricked into voluntarily participating in the ruin of their countries and harming their populations by the Covid measures.
Now, they must continue to comply with the criminal mass they entered, to the point of ending their countries through sanctions that mainly affect them and now even risking nuclear vaporization.
The Covid event was necessary to build the consensus for the War against Russia, never in history was there such a consensus in Europe… Obviously, the most corrupt needed to have come to power in previous years to achieve this state of affairs in which we are now…..They infiltrated the entire political spectrum with impostors, so talking today about classic right and left makes little sense….until we clean the environment of real pollution….
Another thing that comes to be very actual and relevant today is that work by Ernst Jünger, “La Emboscadura”….I am not sure what is the translation for you in English…”The Ambush” may be….
Juts caught my attention a book on analysis of this work by Jünger announced in a web on geopolitics I use to read….It has been there for a while, but just today noticed it…I have not read the book yet, but it seems quite interesting…..
From Spanish wiki on “La Emboscadura”…..
“The Ambush is an essay by Ernst Jünger published in 1951. It deals with the question: How do people behave before and during the catastrophe? As a “forest walker”, Jünger describes a person who is mentally independent of the surrounding society and is able to resist if the respective state is or becomes criminal.
The starting point is a consideration of an election conducted in such a way that there is no longer a real alternative and 98 percent approval is achieved. Some of the aspects cited, such as the uniformed poll workers, the state propaganda or the suggestive ballot papers, are reminiscent of fake elections in dictatorships, but Jünger does not explicitly limit the description to such. The two percent of people who vote NO are the would-be walkers in the woods. Jünger ranks the forest walker, the ambushed, along with the worker and the unknown soldiers among the great figures of our time.
That a forest walker has to offer resistance is the exception. In normal cases, Jünger assumes: “In general, the institutions and the regulations related to them form a viable basis; it is in the air what is correct and what is customary. Of course there are violations, but there are also courts and police ”. However, “the person in ambush” must wait from the beginning the possibility and be prepared for changes that he will eventually face a criminal system: ” But it cannot be restricted to recognize the truth and the good on the upper floor, while in the Keller (basement), the skin peels off other people “….
In a dictatorship, it would not be wise to voice an objection openly, it would only land you in jail. At the same time, by standardizing political life, a dictatorship makes it easier for people walking in the woods to attract attention. “Symbols light up especially in monotonous documents.” A “no” on the wall of a house can suffice as a provocation or appeal. Or a simple “E” for “emboscado”” or “esperanza”…. When violence becomes necessary, wage a partisan war with attacks and sabotage. “It can even paralyze armies, as was seen in the Napoleonic army in Spain.”
If the forest walker resists, he is always outside the respective state legal system, whatever that may be. Therefore, he cannot expect his motives to mitigate the pain. Therefore, he is entitled to his actions only in an ethical sense, never before the jurisprudence of the respective state”…..
“It relies on groupthink and uses conformity, self-censorship, propaganda, and gaslighting to prevent opposition..”
Literally all power systems do this. There is no state system–none–that is immune from “totalitarian” tendencies. Also, “progressivism” is a broad term. FDR was a progressive. So was Nixon. So was Eisenhower.
I think the author is confusing totalitarian humanism–which is the new elite religion that replaced the dominant cancel culture of the right wing 80s moral majority cult and tipper gore–with progressive economic policy. Dont do that. Wokeism has no relationship to the Left.