Sending new arms to Ukraine (a popular talking point among U.S. and British politicians) is a stupid and empty gesture. Why? There is no organized, intact Ukrainian military force capable of receiving and using these weapons. You want evidence? I want to remind you again of the breathless reports that filled Western media two weeks ago about Russian tank and truck columns “stalled” north of Kiev. Some media claimed the column was 40 miles long while others reported it as 40 kilometers (for the math challenged among you, 40 kilometers equals 24 miles).
That is a big fat target that a functional, competent military force would consume. But that column sat in place for at least a week. My Air Force buddy who flew missions against North Vietnamese vehicle columns back in 1970 described how he would first hit the lead vehicle, then the trailing vehicle and then destroy everything in between. We did not see that in Ukraine. There was no significant destruction rained down on the Russian column from the air. And where was the Ukrainian cruise missiles. Those should have been launched (if they existed) and could have caused enormous damage. That did not happen. There also was no Ukrainian artillery barrage on the supposedly “stalled” column.
And where was Ukraine’s infantry? Ukrainian soldiers have received thousands of anti-tanks weapons (e.g., Javelins and NLAWs). The NLAW has an effective range of 800 to 1000 meters. Here is a picture:
How difficult would it be to have a several battalions of Ukrainian soldiers strung out along the 40 mile column to fire NLAWs at the Russian sitting ducks? Yet that did not happen. Why?
The explanation comes from Friday’s briefing by the Head of the Main Operational Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Colonel General Sergei Rudskoy (Colonel General is equivalent to at least a three star general in the U.S. Army):
- Currently, the Ukrainian air forces and the air defense system have been almost completely destroyed. The naval forces of the country ceased to exist.
- Sixteen main military airfields were defeated, from which combat sorties of the AFU aviation were carried out. Thirty nine storage bases and arsenals were destroyed, which contained up to 70% of all stocks of military equipment, materiel and fuel, as well as more than 1 million 54 thousand tons of ammunition.
- All 24 formations of the Land Forces that existed before the start of the operation suffered significant losses. Ukraine has no organized reserves left.
- Losses are replenished at the expense of mobilized persons and personnel of the territorial defence forces who do not have the necessary training, which increases the risk of large losses.
- At the time of the start of the special military operation, the Armed Forces of Ukraine, together with the National Guard, numbered 260 thousand 200 servicemen. During the month of hostilities, their losses amounted to about 30 thousand people, including more than 14 thousand – irretrievable and about 16 thousand – sanitary.
- Of the 2,416 tanks and other armored fighting vehicles that were in combat on February 24, 1,587 units were destroyed; 636 units out of 1,509 field artillery guns and mortars; 163 out of 535 MLRS; 112 out of 152 aircraft, 75 out of 149 helicopters; 36 Bayraktar TB2 UAVs – 35;
- 180 out of 148 S-300 and Buk M1 air defence systems; 300 out of 117 radars for various purposes.
The destruction inflicted on the Ukrainians by Russia is vast. If Ukraine still had a viable air force they would be challenging Russian combat aircraft and carrying out airstrikes on Russian positions. I have seen no reports in Western media about such actions.
In cities, such a Mariupol, that are besieged by Russian forces there has been no visible attempt to provide air support, artillery fire or reinforcements. The AZOV battalion left in an ever shrinking perimeter in Mariupol have no way out and are running out of ammunition and food. No soldier in the world survives long without ammo and chow.
There is evidence that a growing number of Ukrainian soldiers in other parts of the battlefield are surrendering (hat tip to Andrei Martyanov. If Andrei is not on your daily must read you should add him):
The delusional, wishful thinking that infects Western media was on full display yesterday (Friday). Sky News put up this article, Ukraine war: Russia appears to scale back invasion ambitions – but UK warns bombardment of cities will continue. Here is how Sky News reported on General Rudskoy’s briefing cited above:
Russia’s defense ministry claimed it would now concentrate on the “liberation” of the Donbas region.
“The main objectives of the first stage of the operation have generally been accomplished,” said Sergei Rudskoi, head of the Russian General Staff’s Main Operational Directorate.
“The combat potential of the armed forces of Ukraine has been considerably reduced, which makes it possible to focus our core efforts on achieving the main goal – the liberation of Donbas.” . . .
Russia has previously pointed to far bigger ambitions but stiff resistance from Ukraine forces, logistical problems and reported low morale may have taken their toll.
Here is what Rudskoy actually said:
With the beginning of a special military operation, air supremacy was won during the first two days.
Offensive actions of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation are carried out in various directions.
As a result, Russian troops blocked Kiev, Kharkov, Chernigov, Sumy and Nikolaev. Kherson and most of the Zaporozhye region are under full control.
The public and individual experts are wondering what we are doing in the area of blocked Ukrainian cities.
These actions are carried out with the aim of causing such damage to military infrastructure, equipment, personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the results of which allow not only to shackle their forces and do not give them the opportunity to strengthen their grouping in the Donbass, but also will not allow them to do so until the Russian army completely liberates the territories of the DPR and LPR.
Initially, we did not plan to storm them in order to prevent destruction and minimize losses among personnel and civilians.
And although we do not rule out such a possibility, however, as individual groups complete their tasks, and they are being solved successfully, our forces and means will concentrate on the main thing – the complete liberation of Donbass.
Rudskoy delivered a very pointed warning to NATO as well:
We are closely monitoring the statements of the military and political leadership of individual countries about their intention to supply aircraft and air defense systems to Ukraine. In case of implementation– we will not leave it without attention.
We also hear assurances from NATO leaders about non-interference in the conflict. At the same time, some member states of the North Atlantic Alliance propose to close the airspace over Ukraine. I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will immediately respond accordingly to such attempts.
In order to prevent the restoration of weapons and military equipment of the AFU that have received combat damage, the Russian Armed Forces are disabling repair enterprises, arsenals, storage bases, logistics warehouses with high-precision weapons.
At the moment, 30 key enterprises of the military-industrial complex have been hit by cruise missiles X-101, Kalibr, Iskander, and the Kinzhal aviation complex, which carried out repairs of 68% of weapons and equipment disabled during combat operations.
This does not sound like a whipped Russian General licking his wounds. The briefing is concise, factual and instructive. Today’s actions in Western Ukraine–the missile attack on a fuel storage facility in Lviv and missile attacks on a military airfield in Lutsk–reinforce General Rudskoy’s briefing that Russia will continue to demilitarize Ukraine while trying to limit civilian casualties. I take him at his word.
“180 out of 148 S-300 and Buk M1 air defence systems; 300 out of 117 radars for various purposes.”
Don’t understand this. How can you destroy 180 out of 148 S -300?
Larry Johnson says
I think it is a mistranslation–148 out of 180.
D.E. Murray says
This is another one for the record books. Blankfein is the former CEO of Goldman Sachs. He wants to be in government. God help us. (He previously tweeted that “even” Hitler didn’t use chemical weapons….)
Chris Chuba says
Saying that Ukraine striking a target inside of Russia would be like the ‘Doolittle Raid’ is interesting because when the Houthis do this to Saudi Arabia and the UAE we recoil in horror, call it terrorism, and then support the Gulf States in their genocide in Yemen.
BTW attacking a country that is attacking you is fair game if you can do it.
Our real enemy is Davos CRT open borders 36 sexes — I am hoping Russia wins to knock the wind out of globalist sails. You mentioned something that stuck with me — why are there no pictures of active military units. What started me thinking were the melodrama claims = children’s hospital shelled maternity ward with staged pictures of a pregnant actress on a stretcher. The very first picture of the missile hitting the 17th floor was one of theirs also the tank that ran over the old man in the car was a Ukrainian tank. After that I believed nothing including Russia is on the ropes or lost 8,000. The Russians say 1300. I do think the resistance was more than they thought but didn’t ruin it as claimed. Glad I found you I had to use VPN to get Sputnik and RT. hola.org is free and works seamlessly in background
I think we need to be really careful about both the degree of certainty with which we make claims about the state of the military capabilities of either side, and how much we are willing to accept the Russian MOD and generals at their word.
Mr. Johnson seems too willing to accept most everything of what the Russian MOD says on face value. The reality is that both the Russian MOD and the Ukrainian MOD versions of events will both be skewed towards one side to try to win the information war. Reality will be somewhere in between. Its important to acknowledge these biases and try to work around them, which isn’t really being done here.
I think engaging equally with Russian MOD and Ukraine MOD sources and checking them against other independent sources would really benefit this article. As-is, its hard to be able to say how true it is just basing it off of Russian claims and pundit hyperbole.
Larry Johnson says
Bullshit. Deal with the objective facts. Why were the 40 mile Russian columns left untouched? That’s not from the MOD. If they had been hit Ukraine would be crowing from high heaven. Same with the lack of a military response to Mariupol. You appear to be a troll.
It makes sense that the Russian column didn’t face a large-scale coordinated attack. You seem to misunderstand what I said. I’m not saying Ukraine’s military capabilities haven’t been degraded – they have, and have shifted both towards a more defensive posture and towards irregular tactics.
The confirmed drone strikes against parts of that convoy prove that further.
What I think is unwise is to take Russian statements on how many Ukrainian assets have been destroyed (which is very likely embellished) at face value. Maybe Russia has destroyed 75% of what they’ve said, which is likely. Russian figures are still inaccurate and its important to note the natural bias clearly present in both their numbers and Ukraine’s numbers.
I would direct you towards Oryx’s independent numbers for Russian and Ukrainian losses as a better source than either. Every report is backed up by photographic evidence. It probably still has inaccuracies, but is certainly a more unbiased and accurate assessment than either Ukr or Rus. MODs have.